From: Chris Kuehn (ckuehn@uiuc.edu)
Date: Fri Sep 27 2002 - 12:22:33 CDT
"Erik Newman" <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> Quoth Dave King:
>> Erik Newman wrote:
>>
>>> Quoth john marriott:
>>>
>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Quoth Chris Kuehn:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Dave King" <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tester@localhost. <tester@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Body Of Test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reply To Test Post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Snarky Response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Offended Reply!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Predictable Acronymn.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Backpedaling. Denial Of Previous Statements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*Sound Effect*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Random digression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Random compliment. Sexual advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Point out effectiveness of humor. Nominate post for acclaim.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Song parody.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Comment that the above post was written obviously just to
>>>>>>>>>garner a response. Offended remarks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>complaint that the humor in the above post is inconsiderate to
>>>>>>>>those reading and will not gain the poster any popularity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Obscenity-laden request that the poster cease speaking on the
>>>>>>>topic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hitler reference.
>>>>>
>>>>>Attempt to argue seriously argue point.
>>>>
>>>>Point out that such efforts are futile.
>>>
>>> Irrational libertarian rant.
>>>
>> Onomatopoeic response indicating that your posts are no longer
>> visible by me.
>
> URL at which the reason for the previous response is presented.
statement that above url is not of interest to anyone.
chris
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 20 2002 - 18:06:31 CDT