From: Dave King (dhking@uiuc.edu)
Date: Sat Sep 28 2002 - 17:23:00 CDT
Chris Kuehn wrote:
> "Erik Newman" <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>>Quoth Dave King:
>>
>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Quoth Chris Kuehn:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>"Dave King" <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tester@localhost. <tester@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Body Of Test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reply To Test Post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Snarky Response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Offended Reply!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Predictable Acronymn.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Backpedaling. Denial Of Previous Statements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*Sound Effect*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Random digression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Random compliment. Sexual advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Point out effectiveness of humor. Nominate post for acclaim.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Song parody.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Comment that the above post was written obviously just to
>>>>>>>>>>garner a response. Offended remarks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>complaint that the humor in the above post is inconsiderate to
>>>>>>>>>those reading and will not gain the poster any popularity.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Obscenity-laden request that the poster cease speaking on the
>>>>>>>>topic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Hitler reference.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Attempt to argue seriously argue point.
>>>>>
>>>>>Point out that such efforts are futile.
>>>>
>>>>Irrational libertarian rant.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Onomatopoeic response indicating that your posts are no longer
>>>visible by me.
>>
>>URL at which the reason for the previous response is presented.
>
> statement that above url is not of interest to anyone.
Detailed and well thought-out response to the issues in the thread long
after it has run its course.
Dave
--
David H. King "I just... I liked 'if/then.' I liked 'goto'.
dhking@uiuc.edu People said it wasn't right. Who's to say what's
right? It /worked/. That's all I know."
- suck.com, Filler 03/18/98
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 20 2002 - 18:06:31 CDT