From: john marriott (marriott@uiuc.edu.invalid)
Date: Sat Sep 28 2002 - 17:29:23 CDT
Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
> Chris Kuehn wrote:
>> "Erik Newman" <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>Quoth Dave King:
>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>Quoth Chris Kuehn:
>>>>>>>>>>"Dave King" <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>* Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tester@localhost. <tester@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Body Of Test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Reply To Test Post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Snarky Response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Offended Reply!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Predictable Acronymn.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Backpedaling. Denial Of Previous Statements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*Sound Effect*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Random digression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Random compliment. Sexual advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Point out effectiveness of humor. Nominate post for acclaim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Song parody.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Comment that the above post was written obviously just to
>>>>>>>>>>>garner a response. Offended remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>complaint that the humor in the above post is inconsiderate to
>>>>>>>>>>those reading and will not gain the poster any popularity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Obscenity-laden request that the poster cease speaking on the
>>>>>>>>>topic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hitler reference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Attempt to argue seriously argue point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Point out that such efforts are futile.
>>>>>
>>>>>Irrational libertarian rant.
>>>>
>>>>Onomatopoeic response indicating that your posts are no longer
>>>>visible by me.
>>>
>>>URL at which the reason for the previous response is presented.
>>
>> statement that above url is not of interest to anyone.
>
> Detailed and well thought-out response to the issues in the thread long
> after it has run its course.
Predictable Acronym.
john.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 20 2002 - 18:06:31 CDT