From: Vikram Kulkarni (vkulkarn@brownforces.org)
Date: Sat Sep 28 2002 - 17:30:52 CDT
Dave King wrote...
>Chris Kuehn wrote:
>>"Erik Newman" <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>Quoth Dave King:
>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>Quoth Chris Kuehn:
>>>>>>>>>>"Dave King" <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Erik Newman wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Aaron N. Tubbs wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Erik Newman <ejnewman@students.uiuc.edu>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Quoth john marriott:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Dave King <dhking@nospam.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>john marriott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tester@localhost. <tester@localhost> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Body Of Test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Reply To Test Post.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snarky Response.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Offended Reply!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Predictable Acronymn.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Backpedaling. Denial Of Previous Statements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Sound Effect*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Random digression.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Random compliment. Sexual advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Point out effectiveness of humor. Nominate post
>>>>>>>>>>>>> for acclaim.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Song parody.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Comment that the above post was written obviously
>>>>>>>>>>> just to garner a response. Offended remarks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> complaint that the humor in the above post is
>>>>>>>>>> inconsiderate to those reading and will not gain the
>>>>>>>>>> poster any popularity.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Obscenity-laden request that the poster cease speaking
>>>>>>>>> on the topic.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hitler reference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Attempt to argue seriously argue point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Point out that such efforts are futile.
>>>>>
>>>>> Irrational libertarian rant.
>>>>
>>>> Onomatopoeic response indicating that your posts are no
>>>> longer visible by me.
>>>
>>> URL at which the reason for the previous response is
>>> presented.
>>
>> statement that above url is not of interest to anyone.
>
> Detailed and well thought-out response to the issues in the
> thread long after it has run its course.
complaints about grammer [sic].
-- vikram kulkarni
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 20 2002 - 18:06:31 CDT